Beau said:
WordPress is just a CMS. It’s only as good as the people building the website.
It’s also about the site’s structure and how web crawlers read it. WordPress handles many small SEO aspects that non-technical users don’t think about.
@Jony
You still need additional plugins to fully optimize SEO. Crawlers can read code, but structure, hierarchy, and UX optimizations matter too. Build for users, not just Google.
If you think WordPress can’t handle SEO or performance, you’re not utilizing it properly. I have sites scoring 100 on performance and SEO with minimal plugins.
Ivan said:
If you think WordPress can’t handle SEO or performance, you’re not utilizing it properly. I have sites scoring 100 on performance and SEO with minimal plugins.
OK, what are the essential plugins? I have 18 and never know which ones to remove.
Market share doesn’t directly translate to SEO performance. More people use WordPress because it’s widely supported, but Webflow, Framer, or even custom-coded static sites can be just as effective for SEO.
Bowie said:
I custom-code all my sites, and my SEO results are much better than WordPress. WordPress can be clunky and hard to customize unless you know PHP well.
Have you tried modern WP setups like Bricks Builder or GeneratePress with GenerateBlocks? They’re lightweight and give full control without coding.
Israel said:
Webflow is great, but it has a steep learning curve if you’re coming from drag-and-drop builders. Framer is another option, but it’s expensive.
I rank well on Google using Webflow. If you structure your site properly and write quality content, Webflow can work just as well as WordPress.
WordPress gives you full ownership and flexibility. Moving to a third-party platform like Squarespace or Webflow means less control over your site’s SEO and long-term costs.